Ran Prieur http://ranprieur.com/#9a417fe513f58988c3b5b1e84cfc57397194a79b 2026-01-27T15:50:52Z Ran Prieur http://ranprieur.com/ ranprieur@gmail.com January 27. http://ranprieur.com/#6de5d367ec51abb1e2138504f427a9f97341f0e4 2026-01-27T15:50:52Z January 27. While America teetered on the brink, I spent last weekend at a dogsit, obsessively finishing another AI video. The last two days I've been working out the timing, and after a million listens I'm still not tired of this wonderful psych folk dreamscape, recorded probably around 1992 by the New Zealand band The Garbage and the Flowers: Carousel


AI image of guy looking at spooky mirror screen]]>
January 23. http://ranprieur.com/#21629a822f7bb1df7e85b0506092e3f62e615019 2026-01-23T23:10:38Z January 23. Great piece by Cory Doctorow, AI companies will fail. We can salvage something from the wreckage. The most important bit is about "centaurs". With a regular centaur, the human is in charge and makes use of AI tools. That's good. With a reverse centaur, the machine is in charge and makes use of humans. That's bad, and it's happening more and more often. Doctorow's example is a delivery driver who is completely regulated and monitored, a "squishy meat appendage" for stuff the big machine can't do. There are a lot more good insights and you should read the whole thing.

Of course I disagree with him about images:

Here's what I think art is: it starts with an artist, who has some vast, complex, numinous, irreducible feeling in their mind. And the artist infuses that feeling into some artistic medium. They make a song, a poem, a painting, a drawing, a dance, a book or a photograph. And the idea is, when you experience this work, a facsimile of the big, numinous, irreducible feeling will materialize in your mind.

That's just rarely what actually happens. When I feel that as a writer, and when my readers feel like that, it's about different stuff. My top 20 R.E.M. songs and R.E.M.'s top 40 R.E.M. songs have only two songs in common. In the 90s I bought a painting from a friend, I love it and I've had it on my walls ever since, but I would be very surprised if my own feelings about it were a facsimile of his. What he talked about was the process of making it, how it came out of him so fast.

In literature the reader is encouraged to find meanings that the author did not intend, and I think images are the same way, and it's best to consider the making and the viewing as two separate events. AI cannot have the experience of making art. But if a person is looking at an image, they can totally have a "numinous, irreducible feeling" regardless of where the image came from. Otherwise you could reliably tell where it came from by looking for that feeling, and you can't.

Here's a quiz to tell the difference between human-made and AI-made images. This is often framed as AI vs "real", and this makes sense if AI is trying to fake a photograph. But human imaginative images are already unreal, and then the only question that matters is: Do you like it? I suggest taking the quiz with that question, "Do I like it?" instead of "Can I tell if this is AI so I know I'm not supposed to like it?" The key to navigating media in the age of AI is not counting fingers, it's taste. Only by exercising taste can you avoid being drowned in the rising sea of low-quality stuff, wherever it comes from.

I know there are social reasons to prefer human-made images to machine-made images, but those reasons are all because of capitalism and not technology. Under capitalism, it's important for artists to make money because you need money to not starve and die on the streets. If human artists are replaced with AI, those humans no longer deserve to live. In a more just system, humans replaced by machines would still get the money, but that's pretty complicated, so let's just declare the entire population to have already been replaced. With a guaranteed basic standard of living, people who want to do art can just do art -- or anything cheap that they enjoy doing. Whether or not machines can do it too, you can do your own thing and not have to try to wedge it into the cracks of commerce.

Back around to centaurs, a lot of human-made images are already in reverse centaur territory, where a human in a dreary office is required to make images that meet bland standards for mass distribution. I make videos like a regular centaur, by applying my inscrutable subjective taste to images that I outsource. I've done it with both human-made and AI-made images, and the process of pulling gems out of slop, and putting them in order, is exactly the same, and very satisfying. But with AI I get the additional fun of feedback, tweaking prompts to get the machine to do something I like.

Here's my latest video: Rex Holman - Red is the Apple. I picked the song because it's obscure and packed with evocative lines. I used lyrics for prompts when I could, and I thought I might crank it out in days, but it took more than two months to get it right.

]]>
January 21. http://ranprieur.com/#f47ba6fe9bf6d53fb8c3eeb832000cbae5c754a6 2026-01-21T21:50:09Z January 21. Today, American football. If you follow it, you already know that Indiana, once the losingest college program, turned it around in two years and is now the undefeated national champion. It's probably because of their coach. From the CFB subreddit, a list of Indiana accolades since Curt Cignetti took over. So why doesn't every team get a coach that good? Paradoxically, the blue blood programs can't, because they can only get a coach who is good at gladhanding donors, and Cignetti is not that kind of guy. He almost never smiles, and he has such high expectations for his players that he has been known to start walk-ons over top recruits who don't show enough effort in practice. When you get the best athletes to buy into that standard, you're going to win a lot of games.

Another thing Cignetti does really well is use the transfer portal. Suddenly players are getting paid a lot of money and transferring willy-nilly, it's a huge mess, and a lot of coaches are still bad at it. While the top programs got in bidding wars for four and five star players, Cignetti found two and three star veterans who were actually better. Indiana was ranked 72nd in talent, which proves that the talent rankings are stupid. "Stars" are based entirely on high school, and Cignetti is ahead of the game by looking for unheralded older players who are performing well in college. A battle tested 22 year old is going to grind down a more athletic 18 year old, and the team that almost beat Indiana in the championship, Miami, had an even older roster.

The American pro league, the NFL, is by far the most popular sports league in the world, and also the league that does the most to create parity, with a tight salary cap and a draft that sends the best players to the worst teams. If the NFL were run like the American economy, the winner of the Superbowl would get all the draft picks, and win every year, and everyone not on that team would be bored and demoralized, just like you at your job while billionaires cavort. Anyway, last weekend had one of the most beautiful plays you'll ever see, Drake Maye to Kayshon Boutte in falling snow. The throw, the catch, and the camera work are all 10/10.

]]>
January 19. http://ranprieur.com/#f25fcec132e2c07eb04e7d125251121d9ef557e5 2026-01-19T19:30:15Z January 19. Stray links, starting with an archive of the NY Times obit of Renfrew Christie, a South African who decided as a teenager to sabotage their nuclear weapons program. He went to Oxford and chose his field of study to get access to sensitive info about the South African electrical system, turned it over to the ANC, and got arrested. In his forced confession, he described how to do the sabotage, the judge read the whole thing in court, and it worked. "While I was in prison, everything I had ever researched was blown up."

Loosely related Reddit thread, People who have served a long time in prison, what shocked you when you got out? Some of the answers are about how the world has changed, but most of them are about how prison messes up your head.

Two Hacker News threads on the same Aeon essay about Stoicism, one from last week and one from 2016. The older thread is more about what Stoicism is, and the newer thread is more about how social media influencers are getting it wrong.

And a cool BBC piece, The surprising benefits of standing on one leg:

Another study took 2760 men and women in their 50s and put them through three tests -- grip strength, how many times they could go from sitting to standing in a minute and how long they could stand on one leg with their eyes closed. The single-leg stance test proved to be the most informative for their disease risk. Over the next 13 years, those able to stand on one leg for two seconds or less were three times more likely to have died than those who could do so for 10 seconds or more.

]]>
January 16. http://ranprieur.com/#2fd8701ffb0a991935153579f2e10bff8abc7cdd 2026-01-16T16:00:58Z January 16. Every time I do an angry rant, I feel the need to balance it. Here's an optimistic vision of the future of humanity, from the 1975 book The Eighth Tower by John Keel:

As our technological society exhausts our resources and limps to a halt, we will revert back to an age of magic. The world of tomorrow will not be a world of wall-to-wall television and a spaceship in every garage. It will be a world of oracles.... Oneness with the cosmos would eliminate the need for money, for productivity, for an organized civilization. The whole population would become like the scattered few ascetics who sit entranced in caves, enjoying Godhead, total ecstatic unity with the superspectrum.

]]>
January 14. http://ranprieur.com/#7b63c134027064087788bf675183f48e277b1e6b 2026-01-14T14:40:53Z January 14. Thanks Roger for inviting me to expand on what I mean by "the bottleneck of late modernity". Bottleneck has an ecological meaning, but I'm talking about a society that's in a tight place in between two wide places. Right now most of that tightness is in the name of security. Every time I go online there are more strict requirements for passwords and verification. How many billions of shoes had to be taken off at airports because one guy failed to take down a plane with a shoe bomb? We can't go back to pre-9/11 airports because the left is terrified of anything bad ever happening, and the right is terrified of a single point being scored by the outgroup. It's easy to add security and hard to remove it -- except for financial security, which has been gradually whittled away for the last fifty years, because the people who own the government need us to be financially desperate to work in their sweatshops. (If only it was actual sweating and not relentlessly focusing attention on the meaningless.) Violent crime rates peaked in the 90s, and yet I rarely saw security guards in the 90s. Now they're everywhere. Stores that used to have two or three open entrances are down to one entrance with a guard. Their job is not to protect you from violence but to nail down the most extreme wealth inequality of all time. In the face of this inequality, America had a popular uprising to cut taxes for the rich and cut benefits for the poor even more. How much tighter can it get before it gets looser?

My partner's five year old nephew had a nightmare. His mom asked if it was scary. "Yes," he said, "except for the ads." That's how deep we are in dystopia. I would love to live in a world with no advertising, no passwords, no insurance, no ID cards, no border guards, no schooling, and no money. Right now all of that seems wildly unrealistic, but living without any of those things is the way of all life everywhere except for recent humans. Even a few hundred years ago most humans in the world could live without money. If there's reincarnation, I would rather live as all the dung beetles in sequence than another modern human. And yet, there are some wonderful things about it: the music, the games, the drugs, the snacks, the huge variety of imaginary worlds, and I'm enjoying those things as much as I can before this crazy age ends, maybe soon. In the Star Trek universe, WWIII started in 2026. And here's a Reddit thread, In your opinion, what is the most frighteningly believable chain of events that could escalate into a third world war?

]]>
January 12. http://ranprieur.com/#bc1ebb201137c4fe3f171836c9b959447e63385e 2026-01-12T12:20:43Z January 12. YouTube video by Medieval Mindset, Why You'd Rather Live in 1325 Than 2025. It's mainly about how much more colorful and joyful and meaningful life was back then. He has a bunch more videos, including Why You Own Less Than a Medieval Peasant, about how techno-feudalism is more repressive than original feudalism. His newest videos argue that medieval ways are coming back, and I don't really see it, except that audiobooks are replacing reading. I feel like we're now in the tightest part of the bottleneck of late modernity, and we're going to need a severe economic or technological collapse to break us out of it.

Also, I don't have Instagram but if you do, Matt Ponesse makes funny compilations of medieval art.

Finally, The Unbearable Joy of Sitting Alone in A Cafe. If you're over 40 this is so weird, a person who has never lived without constant technological distractions, marveling at what life is like without them. Sometimes people call this "like the 90s". Yes, and also the 80s, the 70s, and every other decade back to the beginning of time. This right now is the anomaly.

]]>
January 10. http://ranprieur.com/#0cd4d89deb7f5457e4b06cf3c17429a6121420bb 2026-01-10T22:00:41Z January 10. Two new Spotify playlists. It's funny, with other projects, the closer I get to the end, the slower I go. But with playlists, the closer I get to the end, the faster I go. Aliens Don't Kill Us is a compilation of happy songs that I've been meaning to put together for years. There's a lot of overlap with my decades playlists, but no overlap with Psych Folk or Forever. And if I do Aliens Don't Kill Us, I have to do Aliens Kill Us, which contains my picks for the ten worst songs of all time, from We Built This City to We Are The World. The images are from two books of 1970s sci fi art, the same books as my Sagan video.

]]>
January 8. http://ranprieur.com/#c25c5093563db0fb1884a0e5f080384c2903bce3 2026-01-08T20:40:42Z January 8. Psychology links, starting with an archive of a clickbaity piece, The One Thing That Child Therapists Say Harms Kids' Happiness The Most: parents wanting their kids to be happy all the time, instead of letting them feel the full range of emotions.

Related: Happiness maximization appears to be a culturally specific preference. "The data suggests that for a large portion of the world's population, other values compete with or supersede the desire for personal happiness. These alternative values might include social harmony, family duty, or the ability to withstand hardship." If you think the meaning of life is to be happy, and things go wrong, then you're double-unhappy because your life is also meaningless. But if you think the meaning of life is to withstand hardship, and things go wrong, then you're not "happy" happy, but your life is still meaningful.

Related: Brain scans reveal an emotional advantage for modest people:

Modest individuals tend to view themselves as a single part of a larger world. They recognize the value and contributions of others and do not remain hyper-focused on their own status. The researchers hypothesized that this trait might allow for a "double win" in emotion regulation. They predicted that modest people would experience fewer negative emotions during rejection but would still experience strong positive emotions during acceptance.

One more from PsyPost: Data from 6 million couples reveals a surprising trend in how we pick our partners. Of course it's completely unsurprising. People are picking partners who share the same psychiatric diagnosis, because that's a big part of identity now.

Finally, a fascinating piece about mind-body practice, Meditation as Wakeful Relaxation: Unclenching Smooth Muscle. The idea is, your body has two kinds of muscles. Skeletal muscles are under conscious control, and are either tensed or relaxed. But smooth muscles are not under conscious control, and have a third state, called "latched", a kind of tensing that requires little or no energy:

Latches can persist for minutes, hours, days, months, or years, and the sum total of all latches likely accounts for the majority of bodily suffering. If you are "holding tension in your body" you are subject to the mechanics of the latch-bridge mechanism. Migraines and cluster headaches are almost certainly inappropriate VSMC latches; all hollow organs are surrounded by smooth muscle and can latch.

Long-term latching is still unproven, but the Hacker News thread has a lot of stuff about meditation techniques for deep relaxation. Personally, I get a lot of help from cannabis -- not that it automatically relaxes me, but if I lie down in silent darkness when I'm high, I discover that silent darkness is a zoo. There are all kinds of subtle things going on that become obvious. People say that drugs interfere with meditation, and it's true that it's harder for me to still my mind, but I'm a lot more motivated to try to still my mind, and a lot more aware of what's going on under the surface.

]]>
January 5. http://ranprieur.com/#e810c307173fe332d3d3e999e31da0b75c1c6c1d 2026-01-05T17:10:31Z January 5. Three more Reddit links. Great thread for schadenfreude, Do you know anyone who actually left their country to get away from what they saw as 'wokeness', and if so, how did that turn out?

A well-informed comment about the many reasons alcohol consumption is declining in the USA.

And from the Seattle subreddit, a smart comment about the two kinds of homeless people. I would say it like this. You've got your high-functioning homeless, who would thrive in a society that was built for the needs of humans rather than the desires of billionaires. They're living in cars or on couches and mostly invisible. Attempts to help these people are hindered by the "homeless problem": mentally ill drug addicts who need to be in the institutions that were shut down in the 1980s.

]]>
January 4. http://ranprieur.com/#e131fc836ab14ee656625d20a063797e442e6750 2026-01-04T16:00:34Z January 4. Everything I have to say about Venezuela is either completely obvious or completely speculative. But here's a good Reddit comment by an Iraq war veteran, about the absurdity of America "running" Venezuela:

When a government collapses by force, power doesn't disappear; it breaks apart, security services fracture, criminal networks step forward, and armed insurgent groups fill gaps and wrap themselves in the language of liberation.... Removing Maduro doesn't automatically rebuild institutions, restore trust, or feed people. It creates a power vacuum in a country already hollowed out by corruption, sanctions, and scarcity.

]]>
January 2, 2026. http://ranprieur.com/#761db9244d8ba3e68c90c5f3257c1852ae967283 2026-01-02T14:40:56Z January 2, 2026. The year that just ended was the worst year ever for the American federal government, and this video is a good summary, What This Year Looks Like to a Historian. I would say it like this: In 1980, the economic right wing took over America and has been ruling it ever since. Even Clinton squeezed the poor and enriched big business. Inevitably, some of the rich got so insane with power that they fell under the spell of Nazi theorist Carl Schmitt, who believed that raw power works better than the rule of law. They got their guy elected president, and with control of congress, he could have passed laws for many of his policies, but that's not his style. He just did it through illegal executive actions that nobody stopped on the top level. But on the level of states and cities and lower courts, there were a lot of actions to slow him down, and now the biggest power trippers are on the brink of losing power, which makes them more dangerous than ever. 2026 is going to be scary, but I think whatever happens, we will be in full recovery mode by 2030.

For me personally, 2025 was great. I wrote the novel I wanted to read, I made my best playlist, and I put a lot more attention on my body, leading to cleaner walking and less clumsiness. In 2026 I plan to practice the pointing and calling method to stop forgetting where I put stuff down, and also work on cleaning up my emotions. The best psychological insight I got in 2025 was oddly from a near-death experience book (Beyond the Light by PMH Atwater), that emotions seem to be caused by the outside world, when really your emotions are you talking to you.

I'll also have a lot of thoughts on AI. I'm not at all worried that AI will replace humans, because for any task that humans like doing, automation can only be a fad. Once you get over the novelty that a machine can do something you'd rather do yourself, you'll go back to doing it yourself. My most unpopular opinion is that AI is good at making images, just not photorealistic images, where it's burning massive resources just to stay out of the uncanny valley. If an image is obviously not real, for example surrealism or impressionism, AI can compete with pretty good human artists, and I'm trying to get as many images as I can before the bubble pops.

]]>