From the Hacker News comment thread:In their natural habitat, wolf packs operated nothing like the prison-yard dynamics he'd observed in the zoo. Instead of hierarchies maintained through aggression, he found family units guided by experienced parents. Leadership wasn't seized through dominance - it was earned through nurturing, teaching, and protecting the collective good.
...
The irony is that in attempting to model human behavior on what we thought was "natural" wolf psychology, we instead normalized the very behaviors that emerge from unnatural confinement. Just as captive wolves exhibit exaggerated aggression and dominance, humans operating within rigid hierarchies and crushing social expectations often adopt similarly distorted patterns - what we might call "captive male syndrome."
Supposed "alpha behaviors" are seemingly identical to toddler behaviors to me. I think it's ironically non-masculine to be so terrified of how you appear that you play act as basically a belligerent child incapable of compromise, teamwork, or navigating disagreements with dignity instead of being yourself.
Now I'm wondering, if alpha behaviors only emerge in captivity, then why do we have billionaires behaving like alphas? Are billionaires in captivity? My answer is yes. That's how deep humans are in social dysfunction, that even our masters are just high-level slaves.
So what would an actually free human society look like? I see two angles to approach it: observed low-tech and speculative high-tech. A good example of the former is the book The Art of Not Being Governed by James C. Scott. A good example of the latter is the essay The Economics of Star Trek by Rick Webb.
Trump lacks certain qualities which the British traditionally esteem. For instance, he has no class, no charm, no coolness, no credibility, no compassion, no wit, no warmth, no wisdom, no subtlety, no sensitivity, no self-awareness, no humility, no honour and no grace.
...
His mind is a simple bot-like algorithm of petty prejudices and knee-jerk nastiness. There is never any under-layer of irony, complexity, nuance or depth. It's all surface. Some Americans might see this as refreshingly upfront. Well, we don't. We see it as having no inner world, no soul.
And from a comment about the debate:
Talking total nonsense, but then yanks are saying "oh he came across well". I realised then that Americans react to tone of voice and might not actually understand basic language. Like dogs.
I think Trump's tone of voice is literally magical. I remember some comedian telling this joke around 1990, where a guy kills his whole family because he heard voices telling him to do it, and it turns out it was just his practical joker buddy. "Ha ha, I really got you this time Bob, I made you kill your whole family!" It's funny because, why don't crazy people just not do what the voices say? The serious answer is, the compulsion must be happening on a deeper level than words.
]]>God, you see, is a word. It is the word for everything not speaking when someone says 'I think.' And by Propper's Law of Inverse Exclusion (which enables a flea in a matchbox to declare itself jailor of the universe) every single 'I think' has intimate knowledge of the surface of what it is not. But as every thinker reflects a different surface of what he isn't, and as God is our word for the whole, it follows that all agreement about God is based on misunderstanding.
And from Lore of Proserpine by Maurice Hewlett:
Who knows what his neighbor sees? Who knows what his dog? Every species of us walks secret from the others; every species of us the centre of his universe, its staple of measure, and its final cause. And if at times one is granted a peep into new heavens and a new earth, and can get no more, perhaps the best thing we win from that is the conviction that we must doubt nothing and wonder at everything.
The latter is a strange 1913 book by a novelist who claimed to see fairies. It's a great companion to Dora Van Gelder's The Real World of Fairies, and I've just added it to my books page, along with Michael Talbot's The Holographic Universe, which I'm now reading for the third time.
]]>