Ran Prieur

"The bigger you build the bonfire, the more darkness is revealed."

- Terence McKenna

essays etc.

landblog
land links, FAQ

communities

misc.
advice, links, books, and more!

novel
Apocalypsopolis, book one

zines
Civilization Will Eat Itself, Superweed 1-4, best of

crashwatch

about me

search this site


Creative Commons License

July 1. Some farm links. First, a fascinating permaculture forum thread on dew ponds. The idea is, if the bottom of a pond is both watertight and insulated from the temperature of the ground, it will fill itself from the air, because water will condense faster than it evaporates.

This Is Not A Weed is a smart article about urban weeds. (They won't let me direct-link to the printer-friendly version, but you can click on it.) The big idea is that "native" and "invasive" don't make any sense in the city, since it's a new kind of habitat where nothing is native. (Actually, you could say the same thing about a monoculture field or lawn.) And instead of condemning everything that we didn't put there, we can decide what's useful. Related: a forum post about a good framework for understanding weeds:

...a weed requires attention to restrict its growth or propagation, while needy plants require attention to establish and/or maintain. Within that framework, each plant should be placed so that it lies as close as possible to the center of that spectrum. The gardener does minimum work by locating each plant where it can maintain itself, but is limited by its environment.

Finally, an article on the possibility of perennial grains, which would let you plant a field of wheat only once and then harvest it every year. This would stop the loss of topsoil and save massive amounts of energy. Of course, the seed companies are not going to be funding this research.


June 30. A couple loose ends from last week: Danny sends this follow-up to Ivan Illich's critique of cars: The Social Ideology of the Motorcar. My favorite idea is in the first paragraph: that cars only work if they're a rare luxury. Personally, I wouldn't have any problem with that. That's one way I'm an anarchist and not a liberal. It's fine if some people live in castles while others live in huts; the important thing is that nobody, by lacking wealth, is in a position where they have to obey.

Also, inspired by a comment from Bruce, I have a few more thoughts about dopamine addiction. I played Civilization II -- I know what a dopamine hit feels like. And it occurs to me that I have never got that feeling from anything that this culture considers productive, useful, or admirable. People who get dopamine-addicted to productive activity are called "workaholics", and it is still not considered healthy! So I'm wondering about the evolutionary purpose of dopamine, and I'm thinking it's not supposed to be attached to something you can do all day every day, only to things that you do rarely.


June 26. Heading up to the land until midweek, but first I thought of some loose ends on dopamine addiction. At the moment, through porn, games, and drugs, anyone in the industrialized world has the option to slide into unproductive pleasure. Without these technologies, some people can still do this, but only if they have very strong imaginations. In civilized culture, these are the "dreamers", and a few become great artists and philosophers. In primitive culture, these must be the people who become shamans.

Some questions: If you use your own imagination to self-administer dopamine, in what ways does this make you stronger than if you were to do the same thing with external tools? In industrial society, is it better to get pleasure through solitary daydreaming, than through engaging with other people in "useful" activities that are mostly harmful? Has the "real" stuff in our society gone so far astray that imaginary worlds are more real? (This leads to a book-length question of what "real" means, but it has something to do with connection to a larger whole.) Is there anything we get pleasure from anymore, that is beneficial on all levels? And now that everyone can get dopamine-addicted, how do you play the advantage of having a strong imagination?


June 24. A few stray links: The Velluvial Matrix is a graduation speech with the usual graduation speech stuff, but also with a good explanation of how exploding medical costs have been caused by complexity. This adds one more piece to Joseph Tainter's story that societies collapse because they keep adding complexity far past the point of diminishing returns.

A few months ago I linked to this 1906 San Francisco streetcar video. Someone suggested that the beautiful smooth motion of everyone on the streets was too good to be true, and that maybe the whole thing was choreographed. Well, here's another one from Barcelona in 1908. Now, my point is not that the early 1900's were paradise. It's this: if you were to pick one million possible worlds, and look at the way that living creatures move about, modern automobile traffic would be the worst. Related: Ivan Illich on Cars.

And here's an article with some sloppy thinking concealing a good point: Was the Cowardly Lion Just Masturbating Too Much? The real issue here is not sexual release, which is healthy no matter how you get it. The issue is that we are using technology to self-administer dopamine, we are getting better and better at it, and it's ruining us. This is what Scott Adams meant when he said that the holodeck will be our last invention. More generally, I think one of our biggest mistakes as a species is the assumption that satisfaction of desires is a good use of technology.

Update: Anne mentions another article in the same magazine with more details on dopamine and addiction.


June 22, late. Back from the land but not much time. Today John Robb had a really nice collection of links.


June 19. I'm up at the land until Tuesday, and then busy with family stuff for most of next week.


June 18. Loose ends on yesterday's subject. A reader writes:

My professional life is conducted entirely electronically... I have fallen into the energy well where I cannot really do anything physical. The incentive structure is such that it is difficult to crawl out of that well.

I'm guessing a lot of you feel that way. One possible view is that a big ship is sinking, and anyone who is too deep in the ship will find it more and more difficult to get out, and be dragged down with it, while people on the edges have a chance to get in lifeboats or swim away. A more optimistic view is that the incentive structure is changing, and if you're paying attention, you will begin to find it easier to crawl out.

Also, I'd love to be proven wrong about home fabricators. Here's how you can start: Design and manufacture a printer that is built to last for decades, with open source software and an interface designed for easy compatibility with past and future computers. Make it so we can use a variety of common local materials for ink. When I see that, then I'll consider the possibility that we could "print" a bicycle.

One more thing: a reader suggests that writing your thoughts on paper might be somehow more powerful than typing them into a computer. I've always felt like I'm a little smarter when I'm handwriting. I thought it was the computer screen making me stupid, but now I wonder if scribbling on paper might be channeling more of the intelligence of the body.


June 17. (permalink) Yesterday I saw this reddit comment thread on printers and how they never work right. I live in a house with two printers and I can't get either one to work on either of two operating systems. On my winter tour 18 months ago, everyone I stayed with had a computer, but almost nobody had a working printer. When I want a hardcopy of a google map, I trace it from the screen.

What's going on? I think this is something deeper than incompetence or profiteering, and NiceDay4ASulk is on the right track with the comment that printers are "the bridge between the digital world and the physical world." Maybe this has something to do with entropy: the physical world is like a higher energy state than the virtual world, so it's easy to take a picture of a physical object and put it in a computer, but to go the other way, and turn bits in a computer into a physical object, is extremely difficult.

Some techno-utopians think we're going to have home fabricators, where you can download information and "print" any physical object. But printing text on paper is harder now than it was 20 years ago. As information systems get more complex, and available energy gets lower, we are moving in the opposite direction, copying physical stuff into the digital world, and moving our consciousness there with it.

The problem is that our consciousness is tied to physical bodies that need food and shelter. Where the digital world does not feed us, it starves us, and then starves itself. Or, as I've written before: every sub-world must justify itself in terms of the world that contains it. It would be wonderful if we could use computers to print bacon and glassy metal building blocks, but realistically, if we are using them at all, we will be using them to share information about how to eat cattail roots and build houses out of sand and clay, with our hands.


June 16, late. With the blog dialed down, I'm going to be focusing on stuff that you are not likely to have read elsewhere. Here is a disturbing and important post about how to keep someone with you forever, in a bad way. The summary is that you keep them in a constant state of crisis and hope, but the whole thing is worth reading. There are great insights that can be applied to jobs, relationships, families, and entire cultures.

Next, an inspiring post by a terrible singer who became a very good singer through 15 years of practice. So there's still hope for the Mountain Goats. Seriously, the way this guy feels about singing, I feel about building: I'm really bad at it, but I'm determined to live in a cabin I built myself, and I think it will end up taking about 15 years.

Finally, why have I just now heard of Electric Wizard? Here's a YouTube version of an awesome nine minute instrumental called Mind Transferral.


June 16. New landblog post about putting a faucet on the spring pipe. That wasn't the only thing I did on this trip, but I'll write about the other stuff later.




I don't do an RSS feed, but you can get feeds from other sources. Here's Page2RSS, and the Google feed for this page.

Posts will stay on this page for one to two weeks, and then drop off the edge. A reader has set up an independent archive that saves the page every day or so, and I save my own favorite bits in these archives:
January - May 2005
June - August 2005
September - October 2005
November - December 2005
January - February 2006
March - April 2006
May - July 2006
August - September 2006
October - November 2006
December 2006 - January 2007
February - March 2007
April - May 2007
June - August 2007
September - October 2007
November - December 2007
January - February 2008
March - April 2008
May - June 2008
July - August 2008
September 2008
October 2008
November - December 2008
January - February 2009
March - April 2009
May - June 2009
July - August 2009
September - November 2009
December 2009 - January 2010
February - March 2010
April - May 2010
June - July 2010